The reason to marginalize Piker is his pledge not to vote for the Dem nominee if it is Gavin Newsom.
14
4
4
That’s not at all a good reason rofl
0
0
0
why should anyone pledge their vote before there's even a primary lol
0
0
8
I will never vote for Gavin Newsom and that's a promise πŸ‘
0
0
9
you have two years to find someone to nominate that isn't virtually indistinguishable from a republican. maybe get on that instead of scolding people that won't vote for that piece of shit.
1
0
29
Me? I do?

Funny how y’all are eager to do the easy thing, assume an online posture, but the hard work of finding and supporting a nominee that suits your values is someone else’s job.
5
0
0
I’ve never heard or seen Piker before but I also pledge to not vote for the Dem nominee if it is Gavin Newsom.
0
0
4
have you considered not nominating an evil piece of shit
2
0
66
It’s up to me?

If it’s Newsom v Vance, you’re staying home?
10
0
4
Narrator: they had not.
0
0
0
So because Piker won’t support the guy who platforms Nazis and tries to promote transphobic propaganda constructed by pedophilic billionaires he should be marginalized?

Sounds like something a Trump supporter would say.
0
0
1
Because you want to lose?
0
0
6
newsom isn't going to be the den nominee so it's a moot point. even the Dems aren't stupid enough to run California twice in a row
1
0
12
Unlike you, I don’t have a crystal ball but even if you’re right, this type of thinking damages nominees (MI, 2024).
2
0
0
Just like when he said America deserves 9/11: he's right, here.
1
0
3
You mean "having real beliefs"? Centrist types hate when you have those.
0
0
30
What is your point in hashtagging the term "purity politics" in your post? Does the hashtag raise awareness to the mere idea of arguments on purity politics in some way, via the search results for that hashtag? Will using that hashtag help usefully group all arguments it is used in?
1
0
12
Criticizing Gavin Newsone for constantly ceding ground to the right and enacting policies that make people's lives actively worse is purity politics apparently
0
0
9
Purity politics are good I will not vote for a guy who gets off on killing homeless and trans people.
0
0
4
Thanks for being the exact kind of piece of shit that Peter's article is about.

Useful demonstrative aid.
0
0
1
No it isn't lol
0
0
3
That sounds like a reason to marginalize Newsom
0
0
51
No this is a good thing.

But then again I actually care about trans folks and the unhoused
0
0
3