It’s up to me?

If it’s Newsom v Vance, you’re staying home?

April 02, 2026 - 15:04 UTC

10
0
4
You’re atrocious at this
0
0
0
So if you were aware that Newsom being the candidate would significantly decrease your chances of winning, wouldn't that be a good reason for the Democrats not to run him?
1
0
14
Yes.
Also not the issue.
4
0
0
Yes because y'all decided trans people don't deserve rights. You abandoned my people why shouldn't I abandon yours?
0
0
2
yes πŸ‘
0
0
4
It is very clear to everyone that you will spend the next three years hyping Newsom and vote for him in the primary instead of just not doing that.
0
0
2
Yes.
0
0
1
It's 2026 this year. So my answer is yes. They have 2 more years to make my answer. "I will leave the house for this person." That is the whole entire point of saying "I will not vote for Newsom" in 2026. It is a warning while there's still time to heed it.
1
0
48
So work hard for your preferred candidate instead of encouraging lazy thinking that could doom our nominee.
9
0
1
If it’s Nazi v Nazi? Sure. Either way a Nazi is taking the WH because libs couldn’t be bothered to band together with anyone left of fascist and push for a non Nazi candidate.
0
0
5
you're spending time shaming people for not voting for him instead of doing something else to advance a candidate who could win
0
0
2
If it's Newsom v Vance, the Democratic Party bigwigs have decided they can lose in perpetuity, regardless of what the party base wants.
0
0
5