have you considered not nominating an evil piece of shit
April 02, 2026 - 15:01 UTC
2
0
66
If it's Newsom v Vance, the Democratic Party bigwigs have decided they can lose in perpetuity, regardless of what the party base wants.
0
0
5
you're spending time shaming people for not voting for him instead of doing something else to advance a candidate who could win
0
0
2
If it’s Nazi v Nazi? Sure. Either way a Nazi is taking the WH because libs couldn’t be bothered to band together with anyone left of fascist and push for a non Nazi candidate.
0
0
5
It's 2026 this year. So my answer is yes. They have 2 more years to make my answer. "I will leave the house for this person." That is the whole entire point of saying "I will not vote for Newsom" in 2026. It is a warning while there's still time to heed it.
1
0
48
It is very clear to everyone that you will spend the next three years hyping Newsom and vote for him in the primary instead of just not doing that.
0
0
2
Yes because y'all decided trans people don't deserve rights. You abandoned my people why shouldn't I abandon yours?
0
0
2
So if you were aware that Newsom being the candidate would significantly decrease your chances of winning, wouldn't that be a good reason for the Democrats not to run him?
1
0
14