But even though the platform itself probably still needs to be sited south of ESFV, there's probably an opportunity to have an underground pedestrian passage with a stair/elevator that exits onto the ESFV platform without hitting the storm drain (i made a diagram of this a bit ago but can't dig it

April 11, 2026 - 01:53 UTC

1
0
5
up now). they could also, of course, site it off-street and take property (it'll need to be sited off street at the metrolink stn too). that would allow for a better G cxn, but would need to cross van nuys to get to ESFV. of the two I feel like prioritizing G is better, since at least half of the
1
0
3
transfers from ESFV will come at the metrolink stn once its built after the IOS? Building it off-street would be pricier, but could be better. They're to report back on it within 9 months.
0
0
1