up now). they could also, of course, site it off-street and take property (it'll need to be sited off street at the metrolink stn too). that would allow for a better G cxn, but would need to cross van nuys to get to ESFV. of the two I feel like prioritizing G is better, since at least half of the
1
0
5
transfers from ESFV will come at the metrolink stn once its built after the IOS? Building it off-street would be pricier, but could be better. They're to report back on it within 9 months.
0
0
3