I'd consider it an enormous step forward in NYT reporting if they simply did 2 things:
1. Stopped granting the benefit of the doubt to Trump statements. A serial liar should be presumed to be lying.
2. Stopped laundering evidence. Report what Trump actually says, instead of resorting to euphemisms.
1. Stopped granting the benefit of the doubt to Trump statements. A serial liar should be presumed to be lying.
2. Stopped laundering evidence. Report what Trump actually says, instead of resorting to euphemisms.
December 10, 2025 - 17:18 UTC
0
0
5