Instead, they want the case sent back down to the district court for a full trial on the merits.
On the other hand, Texas, the appealing party before the Supreme Court, wants the high court to weigh on the standards applied by the district court at the PI phase.
The Texas case is a bit interesting procedurally because the plaintiffs in the case (who won a preliminary injunction below) are mostly asking SCOTUS to dismiss the case on the grounds that disputes over the PI are now moot in light of the Supreme Court stay.
The SAVE Act goes beyond voter ID. It would require a passport or birth certificate to register to vote, which would block millions of American citizens from voting.
“In 2000, 60% of all Latinos in the region lived in New York City, but by 2024, this percentage had declined to 46%, meaning that most Latinos in the region now live outside the city.”
“Hollywood studios are making significantly fewer movies and television shows than they did just a few years ago. The ones they do make are increasingly being shot in other countries and states.”
The Brennan Center’s Jesse Wegman explains why he’s starting a newsletter about the Supreme Court — what needs to change for the institution, why, and how to go about it. bit.ly/3NH1Vvs
First take out of court: Trump will lose, as he always should have, and the main question is how badly he’ll lose and on what grounds. There is a path for a 9-0 ruling, with Alito (and, to a less clear extent, Thomas) as the sticking points. More to come at Law Dork: www.lawdork.com/
Breaking: The president has signed an executive order on mail voting. He has no lawful authority to write the rules that govern our elections. He tried a year ago; we sued him; we won. A year later, he has tried again. He can expect the same result. 1/2
As the Supreme Court prepares to take up the question of birthright citizenship on Wed, a great look at the immigration stories of the Justices' families.