Damn, that's an effective question
April 09, 2026 - 03:32 UTC
1
0
0
Something about phrasing it in this specific way causes them to slam facefirst into a wall of cognitive dissonance.
They can't (correctly) say "the candidate" because it's too obviously self-contradictory, but on some level they know saying "the voters" would sound horrible. And thus: Sidestepping.
They can't (correctly) say "the candidate" because it's too obviously self-contradictory, but on some level they know saying "the voters" would sound horrible. And thus: Sidestepping.
1
0
2
Though, uh... "if that happens then women deserve to lose their rights" is... not exactly the most graceful sidestep I've ever seen in response to it.
I feel like it says something about this man that THAT'S where his mind went, when pretty much any other rhetorical tactic would've worked better.
I feel like it says something about this man that THAT'S where his mind went, when pretty much any other rhetorical tactic would've worked better.
0
0
3