Yeah, I should say that the Arian heresy proper is fairly specific, but definitely the rejection of the idea that Jesus/The Son is coequal with God the Father has arisen again and again.

April 11, 2026 - 01:29 UTC

1
0
7
yeah it was actually interesting from a philosophical perspective. on one hand you had ppl like me who believed "arianism" was a discrete historical movement, but lots of christian editors took it seriously as an "objective" description of a specific kind of heretical thought
1
0
5
there's also the whole thing where even in the 4th century CE lots of ppl described as "arians" in the sources almost certainly did not consider themselves to be (they didn't believe "there was a time when christ was not" but also didn't adhere to the nicene creed's homoousian formulation)
1
0
5