Please Do Not Release Any More Epstein Files, They Are Not Important, by A Guy In The Epstein Files

December 18, 2025 - 17:47 UTC

21
3
1744
My "I'm not in the Epstein Files" article is raising a lot of questions already answered by my article.
0
0
2
The nerve to write “Count me out” when you literally know you’re in the fucking files.
0
0
1
Oh boy.
0
0
0
Pam Bondi doesn't give a damn about the victims. She's altering the Epstein files to protect her boss, the pedophile.
0
0
1
bsky.app/profile/headhuntersully.bsky.social/post/3mabsarxuok27
0
0
0
it's so unlike David Brooks to fail to disclose a major conflict of interest. wait, hold on, I just remembered something
4
0
130
did David Brooks name a dog after his penchant for getting involved with elites doing wrong specifically so he could justify what they were doing as good
0
0
1
Three years after Jeffrey Epstein was sentenced to prison for "procuring for prostitution a girl below age 18," David Brooks hung out with him at an event, which Brooks declined to disclose in a recent Epstein-files-are-no-big-deal column, and the NYT is fine with that.

bsky.app/profile/chrislhayes.bsky.social/post/3mabushnb622t
8
0
182
Listen if you don't accept a little corruption you're never going to be able to find anyone to fill those crucial "spreading conservative propaganda in a way that's palatable to liberals" columnist slots
0
0
0
MOAR LIKE THE ASSPEN INSTITUTE AMIRITE

<< deletes account >>
0
0
0
That just looks bad
0
0
0
Streisand Effect in action. I had no idea Brooks was in the files until now.
0
0
2
Wow. I've been to many, many dinners over the years with lots of people I don't know. If any of them turn out to be pedophiles, I'm screwed.
1
0
1
if one of them doesn't "turn out to be" a pedophile but rather had *already been sentenced to prison* for procuring an under-age prostitute, and you write a column urging people to stop digging into that guy's pedophile associates without disclosing your own contact with him, you won't look great!
1
0
10
Well, on my side of the fence, it is, "Please don't release the Epstein Files because the Epstein Files do not exist anymore and I don't want to read propaganda and witness my fellow citizens get excited over false information." We will never see the true files. How can anyone think we would?
0
0
0
This is what the MAGA wanted. Bongino spread conspiracy theories now he saw the smut, money laundering, extortion and sex trafficking of minors he saw these files then quit his job at the FBI.
0
0
0
Everyone Please Stop Talking So Much About Bank Robberies

- by a guy who attends dinner parties with the bank robbing gangs
0
0
5
lowkey one of the worst humans of the past 50 years
0
0
2
"Trump was a pedophile 21 years ago, why care now?"

Welp
1
0
0
There ain't no former to that title.
0
0
1
"The Epstein Story? Count Me Out"
- by Ghislaine Maxwell
0
0
1
1
0
0
All he and Epstein did was just enjoy some steamed, er, hams.
0
0
1
0
0
1
Why are so many people obsessed with child rape and sex trafficking? There are more important things to worry about.

Reason #23 why #Metoo needed to happen.
0
0
0
Because they're not the Epstein files. They're the tRumpstein files, or the tRump files. That's why we care.

And tRump says it was all Dems in the files. Don't forget, tRump was a Democrat. He's changed his party affiliation more times than Vance has changed his name.
0
0
0
Pretty much everyone came to the same conclusion on reading that: "David Brooks is in the Epstein Files."
0
0
2
These fucking men! NONE of them have any shame or integrity.
1
0
0
#TooManyMen
0
0
0