June 15, 2025 - 02:31 UTC

12
20
2498
The guidelines for enforcement change for each president. That might be pure hypocrisy by dems, but it might be objecting to new tactics and guidelines.
0
0
0
So that's 22 years anyone could have started and established an actual leftist political party...... and yet...... just 22 years bitching about the obivious
1
0
2
Independents have tried to run but get shut from debate, also you never see the communist party given the time of day at these debates, its just elephants vs donkeys.
1
0
2
Depends how they are being used in afraid
8
0
0
No, it doesn't, arms of the state that exist for the sole purpose of doing violence at people deemed not good enough to exist near are fundamentally bad actually.
0
0
11
Akchually there are perfectly valid uses for schutzstaffel.
0
0
6
How do you envision them being used in a moral fashion?
1
0
33
Not really. Ice has been doing terrible shit when democrats are in power too but when we're winning nobody (relatively) cares or questions. But even if they weren't, it's dumb to fund and maintain an organization permitted to abduct, imprison, abuse and deport people with no due process or oversight
1
0
16
They were used the exact same way, only trump gave them more money and jurisdiction
1
0
6
The dems use them the exact same way, because the only use case for the thugs who kidnap people is kidnapping people
1
0
89
bsky.app/profile/theeliasrework.bsky.social/post/3lrwyxru3mk2n
0
0
0
Well, duh. ICE has never been used as a radicalized political weapon against humanity before.
1
0
2
Actually impressive someone can be this wrong. We literally had ICE agents on horses whipping Haitian migrants like two years ago.
1
0
1
The two-party system is a claptrap in disguise.
2
0
9
I loved Claptrap!
0
0
1
Its actually two sides of the same coin, one side is the iron gantlet of 1984, and the other the rubber glove of Brave New World.

In the end both parties are nothing but two flavors of fascism given under the illusion of choice.
1
0
4
correct me if im wrong but didn't ice mostly go for non-citizen criminals and people who could've actually been a threat rather than just anyone
16
0
3
0
0
9
No, the original intent was for a special agency to pursue immigrant terrorists and international traffickers working in the US, but there isn't actually very much of that.
The ICE leadership wanted to show that they actually did stuff to justify their budget, so they became the gestapo.
2
0
36
Sadly, no. It just goes after immigrants without a visa.
1
0
22
ur wrong, & phrasing like 'non-citizens' is the foundation of supremacy culture
0
0
12
Correct me if I’m wrong but you don’t pay a lot of attention huh?
1
1
205
Obama also notably had the case where they put a toddler in front of a judge and he was expected to /defend himself legally/ because we dont have a right to a lawyer
1
0
29
let me write a real answer:

Criminals who serve their time should not then be additionally deported. they should serve their time and leave like anyone else, regardless of immigration status. immigration status is something which is bought in the USA, just like anything else. adding additional
1
0
1
you are beyond wrong.
2
0
5
lol. lmao.
1
0
0
Be honest - is this something you are just assuming is the case?
1
0
9
acab
1
0
68
you're 19

it's genuinely safe to assume you're wrong before speaking, especially about a post that involves patterns prior to your conception
0
0
6
You are idiotically wrong
0
0
3
To continue to support the Democratic Party has become morally indefensible. We have a duopoly that overwhelmingly supports genocide. It's long past time to crush both Parties and even put some on trial for crimes against humanity.
1
0
6
Yep, this is both a problem and hypocritical.
0
0
3
Alex, what is Ratchet theory?
0
0
25
Sources please and thanks
1
0
0
? Sources for...
1
0
2