do you think it’s primarily complexity or licensing costs? or both?

February 07, 2026 - 14:58 UTC

1
0
0
Not licensing. JXL has no royalty. HEIC actually costs them a license.

It's all about the die area spend. HEIC is practically free: they can use the HEVC/H.265 video encoder already on the chip. And JPEG-1992 is so tiny that it's in the noise. JXL is mathematically much more complex (expensive).
1
0
1
Not to say we won't ever see a HW JXL encoder, but given that we're first seeing JXL encode IP show up in late 2025 I would only expect to potentially see it on the next wave of cameras in 2-5 years (current chip arch was likely frozen 2-3 years ago).
0
0
1