If it offers to write for me, I decline and write it myself. Ethics of training data and environmental considerations aside, I think that's the way.

At LMG, I always wanted my words to be my own words; Even though I occasionally hosted videos that I didn't write, I did read and edit their scripts.

July 27, 2025 - 02:30 UTC

2
0
65
So I think the idea that it's going to be the 90s dot-com boom all over again, where anyone who can't use AI is going to fall behind, is asinine. It's an app. I think it's far harder to pick up MS Office or Google Docs than it is to use an AI assistant. AI just needs to prove itself reliable first.
2
1
61
At this moment in time If I see AI, I immediatly ignore, block, do not interact. Because it's only half true. Yes it's artificial - no it's not intelligent. There has ALWAYS been a difference between intelligence and knowledge. It's very well knowing stuff if you don't know what to do with it.
2
0
2
Early on I feel like there was a lot of excitement based around how good LLMs were compared to what earlier models did. And for boilerplate stuff, sure, it’s better than an ordinary template. But if you need something written to be *TRUE* not just “well-written”, LLMs literally cannot handle that.
0
0
0
Hell even autocorrupt on phones i allow it to pop suggestions at the top of the keyboard, but every phone i ever had the second thing i do is disable automatic text replacement(immediately after setting 3 button nav to have the back button on the left). "A.I."'s making ALL who use it dumber
0
0
0