The tools for destroying a liberal democracy are not the same as those for building one.

As with terrorism, that the enemy’s tactics have an effect is not evidence of effectiveness. Democrats could turn a federal agency into a paramilitary and use it to terrorize Americans, but to what end?
4
0
41
OP wasn't advocating for the terrorization of random Americans. They were advocating for justice. ICE is terrorizing innocent Americans. Handcuffing the non-innocent fascists (read: those in power and those who have committed crimes) is justice.
2
0
1
“Using the tools they are building against them” is not describing prosecuting civil rights violations.
0
0
3
His self QT says, "drag the heritage foundation board into guantanamo. deport jesse watters to CECOT"

I understand the sentiment but I think it's a mistake. Having those things as things POTUS can do at his discretion is bad. Establish that they are *crimes*, and put people in prison for them.
1
0
0
Our tool is the law and it is our job to use political power to make the law work for the republic rather than against it.
0
0
2
It was honestly a surprise to me that democratic presidents did not roll back dhs' power and authorities.
0
0
1
Hmm. If i read GLHM correctly, the tools of destruction would be used to excise the tyrannical parts of what we have now which once was a imperfect but heading in a good direction system.

The rebuilding and tyranny-proofing part would be like the end of WW2, less the gross errors, we hope.
1
0
0
Which is, frankly, underpants gnome logic. The methods and tools of MAGA are 1. destroying the federal government 2. Using it to terrorize people. Neither of those are helpful to radically reorganizing the country and tyranny-proofing it.
2
0
2