If they were deciding based on anything other than rule-of-law, what difference does it make that they were Obama's?

The Reich-wing resorts to that kind of argument because it undermines rule-of-law. Fear, uncertainty and doubt leave voters with only blind faith to cling to.

/1

January 14, 2026 - 18:35 UTC

2
0
1
Rule of law let's American leaders away with immoral acts against humanity. It's not the beacon of light and hope people hold it to.
1
0
0
Rule-of-law only exists when laws apply equally to everyone. It cannot co-exist with prejudice and privilege.

Which means it has never existed in the history of the world...because the Mayo Mafia has always been exempt.

Uncompromising rule-of-law is the exact prescription for fascism.
1
0
0
It may feel good to punch back with similar sophomoric arguments, but it undermines the foundation we need to build rule-of-law.

We cannot fall into that trap if we are going to steal voters from them and flip Red States.

False binaries help the two fascist parties, not progressives.

/2
0
0
0