i think we probably went wrong when we went from letitimacy of tule derived from god to legitimacy of rule derived from if u bring in capital or not
10
0
24
With 'divine' rule you have slightly randomized traits in your rulers. Now we provide a path for the worst people to game the rules.

"Every kind of 'justice' other than absolute equality will, in practice, reward some quality quite other than virtue, and is therefore to be condemned." - Russell
0
0
0
i mean capital is a sort of theology
0
0
0
the mistake was thinking the latter was any more based in reality than the former. now a guy just covers himself in wealth signifiers instead of symbols of divine favor
2
0
4
it definitely seems like they succeeded at this too because everyone was clowning on the english king's golden throne but people don't react the same way to squillion dollar suits and makeup
1
0
3
at least Louis XIV put on some cool ballets
0
0
1
The legitimacy of one's tribal god was always defined by the tribal might of the nation.

You'll notice how Yahweh was defeated early in the Bible and then came back to kick ass.
0
0
0
*looks at the whole of the roman empire history*

dang.
0
0
2
let alone prosperity doctrine capital == mandate of heaven
0
0
3
It's really ironically boring philosophically. Some extrapolation of meaning from meta, super, or transcendental forces to how many ice shakers bezo has on his yacht.
0
0
1
this mf said letitimacy of tule
2
0
5
As a Vintage Story player my ears pricked up, LOL
0
0
0
base it on how many gods you kill instead
0
0
2