You may note that the original link above now says something different. You can still find the full letter here:

writings.thisismissem.social/statement-on-discourse-about-activitypub-and-at-protocol/

September 06, 2025 - 19:40 UTC

5
0
6
Thanks for writing this!

This has my full support and what brought me joy while building ActivityStreams and IndieWeb solutions through the decades (voxpelli.com/2016/03/my-2015-in-indieweb/, voxpelli.com/2011/10/activity-streams-flattr-api/ etc)

I would gladly add myself as a signatory if you want.
0
0
2
The wild irony of this getting taken down jfc
1
0
3
It is definitely not lost on me, but oh well, it is what it is. It will be interesting to see what actual objections there are, besides a "process objection" and any sort of protocol superiority arguments.
0
0
3
✍🏻 Tynan Purdy (Independent AT Protocol & OSW advocate)
1
0
0
added your signature to my copy.
0
0
1
hello, Emelia. I understand I'm a bit late 😅 but I read your statement, and I totally agreed with your message, especially here "we must work together, cross-pollinate and share ideas, and participate within each other's communities with respect and mutual understanding". this is exactly why …
1
0
0
… I've been continuously working both on activitypub and atproto! are you still accepting a new signature? if so could you add my signature at the end? thanks!

-- TAKAHASHI Shuuji (elk and npmx contributor) -- [@shuuji3.xyz](uri://https://bsky.app/profile/shuuji3.xyz)" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">bsky.app/profile/shuuji3.xyz)">@shuuji3.xyz](uri://https://bsky.app/profile/shuuji3.xyz) / [@shuuji3@webtoo.ls](uri://https://elk.zone/@shuuji3@webtoo.ls)" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">elk.zone/@shuuji3@webtoo.ls)">@shuuji3@webtoo.ls](uri://https://elk.zone/@shuuji3@webtoo.ls)
1
0
0
😐
0
0
1