A hallucination engine has a lot of uses, and some produce useful scientific data (protien folding and suchlike), but those are treated like any other hypothesis and get tested before being utilized. Aesthetic uses go to the user, who may have tacky taste but will know what they like/asked for.
1
0
0
People making informational requests are going to request both things they can spot as fishy, and things they aren't equipped to without additional fact-checking.

The question is if the hallucination/failure rate with the additional processes lashed in is better/worse than a non-AI websearch.
0
0
0