I don't know if I am missing something, but this change in the law looks not intended because of what conseqeunces it could have in practice. And if it was intended, whomever introduced it should be hoisted by their nose hair.

April 03, 2026 - 16:33 UTC

1
0
0
Passing changes to a law, and not having any processes ready to go for handling the situation post-change, is such clownery. I wonder how long until I get to read some conspiracy angle on the thing.
0
0
0