Yeah, the law itself makes it sound like writing and furry porn wouldn’t count because it couldn’t be mistaken for real people, but I’m not a lawyer so I don’t know how open to interpretation that is
Like if I thought furry art might be traced from a real image, is that enough of a connection?
Like if I thought furry art might be traced from a real image, is that enough of a connection?
April 10, 2026 - 14:53 UTC
1
0
2