Um, yay? I think it’s time to stop comparing and competing and just enjoy Bluesky. Same goes for people who obsessed with their followers number. It’s not a contest, folks. Large numbers aren’t proof that content is quality.

December 03, 2024 - 17:27 UTC

9
0
133
Finding undiscovered gems is more satisfying than simply viewing those put before us.

It really opens up your mind.
1
0
2
Absolutely! I have great conversations with the undiscovered gems. I get zero response from owners of huge accounts.
1
0
1
Yay quality.

This numbers thing has gone absolutely pathological, like across the board.

TV Pundit: "Fentanyl use is rising among teens while the number of college applicants drop. So what aren't schools doing to promote fentanyl to earners of top grades? Let me tell you."
0
0
3
Boom!
0
0
1
Agreed, Don’t put a diamond next to dirt
Don't mix gold with garbage
0
0
1
Account with follower numbers that would populate a large city: Posted 6:30 am. "I brushed my teeth this morning." 6:35 am. 50k likes and 30k reposts.

*Made-up example. No large accounts were harmed in the making of this post.
2
0
49
πŸ˜„
0
0
5
Clarification question: Was this post accompanied by an image of some improbably attractive person brushing their teeth, but wearing full makeup and the image is taken from a low angle looking up through cleavage?

Because that sounds like something you'd encounter in some social media.
1
0
3
Ive had to unfollow and mute so many accounts because they just wont stop talking about twitter, elon, and politics. People bringing their damn baggage. Leave it at the door! All this dude is bragging about is wasting 4 hours doomscrolling apps.
1
0
1
Agree 100%. πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘
0
0
1
Agree
0
0
1