Surely they just had failed to understand the decisiveness and efficiency of one-person decision making! Nor, for example, were they keen students of history where single rulers had plunged their countries into disaster! For 18th century Europe was a place of enlightenment and peace!
3
0
97
I just don't see how they could've imagined a flamboyant and eccentric self-involved "everything is whimsy" individual at the helm; it's like they predicted Trump. Remarkable.
0
0
1
It surely is not the case that at the moment they rebelled they were the subjects of a King who suffered long bouts of a serious mental illness! Providence would never have allowed such a thing.
2
2
88
The King of England had no executive power by that point.
0
0
1
Well, anyway, we will never know, for none for them wrote extensive pseudonymous pamphlets explaining their concerns about this very topic.
4
0
90
It’s fair question
0
0
1