It is highly incorrect. You cite Tiktok? 🤣 "The Jewish claim to indigeneity is based on a three-thousand-year-old continuous history and status since ancient times...not denying Arab claims on the land, it must be recognized that in Israel, the Jews are not settler colonists." ~Hoover Institute

September 02, 2025 - 13:29 UTC

2
0
11
Without a drop of DNA to back up the claim. PERIOD!

But just so we are clear, there is NO SUCH THING as a 3000 year old claim to land.

It’s fucking nonsense. NO PERSON ON PLANER EARTH has a greater claim to a peace of land based on a 3000 year old story, than the people who have continuously
4
0
0
Palestinians have NOT continuously lived there. The area has been a part of several or many nations over the years. Palestinians are just people who wandered in and stayed. Their original homeland is somewhere within the Muslim or Arab states.
0
0
1
lived on that land since it’s inception. Palestinians are the NATIVE people of that land who converted religion centuries ago. Religion is NOT fucking DNA.

Palestinians have a GREAT DEAL more genetic connection to the ancient Jews than any European Jew.

But in any event, a 3000 year old claim
1
1
14
gee, I wonder why Jews were expelled from this land all that time ago.
0
0
0
You do know that you could, like, do a Google search before setting your idiot fingers a-typing, right?
0
0
1
Here's something else to think about. The only time that land has ever been an actual state-with it's own borders, govt, etc-was when it was Israel, and then when Britain took control during the Mandate years. Britain mistakenly used Palestine as the name, but that was originally a misnomer by Rome.
1
0
1