do winners pay losers, or is it the other way around
15
0
218
It depends. WW2 Italy is a case where the winners actually did pay the loser.
0
0
1
Man if you remember the hysterics about “pallets of cash” during the Obama Administration this is particularly hard to take.
0
0
2
Wow! So huge, never been seen before, mucho bigger than Obama's payment! So much winning!

The United States, Iran, and $1.7 billion: Sorting out the details | Brookings share.google/3tpECdUmNLWuXcuxs
0
0
0
the magnanimous King allowed payment of a tribute to the vanquished foes!
0
0
2
An L is just a W drawn incorrectly!
1
0
3
You can fix it with a Sharpie.
1
0
1
Plz take lots of photos of the pallets of cash for posterity.
0
0
2
I’ve been reliably informed that the release of frozen funds to the Iranian government is something Republicans and the media consider a serious betrayal of America, so I’m sure this will have sweeping consequences for Trump’s support from his party and how the press covers him
0
0
10
Pallets of cash [derogatory] you say?
0
0
0
As long as it’s not cash 💰 shipped on PALLETS, it’s different!
0
0
1
i'm sure we're not actually paying them, iran just demanded as a precondition that we visit their wallet inspector first
0
0
2
The last I saw from the Iranians was that they were refusing to talk because the Trumpies hadn't met their demands
0
0
6
In curling, the winners traditionally buy beer for the losers.

(When my kid was on a championship U18 team that routinely bested adults, I had to buy a lot of beer.)

And maybe they could sweep some of the mines, I don't know.
0
0
1