The U.S. Supreme Court is going to “kill” Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), said former Vice President Kamala Harris today at the National Action Network (NAN) convention in New York. www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/harris-warns-scotus-likely-to-gut-vra-calls-save-america-act-a-poll-tax/
35
8
883
I just listened to a zoom with Janai Nelson the civil rights attorney that came out of retirement to give the oral argument for Louisiana vs Callais in front of the Supreme Court in March 2025 and then again in November 2025! Louisiana requested a ruling by January! I pray Kamala is wrong!!
0
0
4
Everyone needs to get their ducks in order. Save a dollar, borrow a dollar, get ride, register, make sure if you moved, that has been updated.
We must hedge our bets!!
0
0
1
Do these big wigs do anything other than talk?
0
0
0
John Roberts who I will not even honor with his title has been working at removing the VRA ever since the 80's. "Long-Term Strategy: Roberts' efforts against the VRA date back to the 1980s, when he was a young lawyer in the Justice Department attempting to narrow the scope of the act."
1
0
9
"..And yet from his earliest days, Roberts has expressed more concern about the unequal treatment of states than the unequal treatment of people. As he put it in one 1982 memo, the law represents “the most intrusive interference imaginable by federal courts into state and local processes.” "
2
0
6
There is a lot more written about his reasons against the VRA; for now we'll leave it to others to give me any reasons why anything he has against the VRA is justifiable.
0
0
3
Don’t we know it.
0
0
1
They seem to be on a mission to destroy the republic.
1
0
9
Yes. The king is working for Putin.
0
0
4
Expand the house. It’s doable legislatively and fixes both gerrymandering and nonrepresentative elected officials.

Get the fuck to it democrats. Add it to our platform.
5
1
36
Great suggestion, Captain!

Dems, get off duffs, shut down focus groups, start fighting the five alarm fire!
0
0
1
They too busy trying to be on television
0
0
1
YES! Expand the House!
2
0
6
DC and Puerto Rico statehood. Expand the House and the Senate.
1
1
3
Nothing we can do. Pedos good ole boys.
0
0
0
What is section 2
1
0
2
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act prohibits any voting practice or procedure that results in discrimination against voters based on race, color, or language minority status.
0
0
2
They've been heading that way for awhile.
0
0
0
The Simp Six on the Roberts court need to be removed, and all of their corrupt decisions vacated.

Bad faith jurisprudence cannot be tolerated.
0
0
0
Some Need to be Impeached. ASAP. Trump needs an immediate Psychiatric Evaluation & Hospitalization for his Dangerous Behavior. It is truly a Danger To National Security.🤬🤬🤬
1
0
7
No, REPUBLICANS are a danger to our national security. They watch this loon destroy our country daily and literally DO NOTHING! Let's stop focusing on Trump's mental illness and instead focus on REPUBLICANS' failure to stop him!
0
0
9
Section 2 in part: Denial or abridgement of right to vote on account of race or color through voting qualifications or prerequisites;
This will apply to all protected classes including women.
Please elaborate
0
0
18
Won’t matter if Trump and the GOP have angered enough right-wing voters to either vote for Democrats or just sit out the midterm election entirely.
0
0
0
Omgosh. Kamala! Life would be normal if we elected her.
0
0
9
Then is it time to enjoy the things we loved doing with the time we have left, or do we start physically fighting back against the MAGA Trump cult regime?
1
0
3
We march, write, vote. Physical violence plays into their hands
1
0
1
The Supremly Corrupt Court wants to hold onto their own power! Same reason Roberts sat on The immunity case from Dec 2023-July 2024
0
0
2
Isn’t Robert’s and Dump having a tiff? Isn’t he the only one
That was ignored at the State of the Union address? I don’t
Think Kamala is right.
0
0
0
This is not a court, it’s a caravan of political activists whose reasons are retrospective to their holdings. If we are to survive as a nation, we’ll have to replace stare decisis with a new legal doctrine that ignores activist precedent: pro democratia.
0
0
0
I hope she’s wrong
1
0
9
She was not wrong about Trump !
0
0
6
They aren’t independent judges, they’re just the supreme senate. There’s no rules they have to follow, they can just rule however they want.
0
0
0
Shocking no one

This is why laws are not enough. SCOTUS will throw out laws. Harder to ignore well written constitutional amendments.
0
0
0
Reprehensible
0
0
5
John Roberts has been on a quest to kill the VRA since his days working for Reagan. He is a racist and should be treated as such.
1
0
51
It was his main job no?
0
0
8
I no longer trust the US Supreme Court. The whole thing need stripped out and we need to start over.
0
0
1
Of course they are. It’s what the oligarchs who own the SCOTUS majority want!
0
0
2
bad enough every EO and action of trump in both his terms has to be undone, but also the vast majority of the rulings of the roberts court also have to be reversed
0
0
1
Isn't it amazing how GWBush is still dismantling democracy after 25+ years? Roberts is the energizer bunny
1
0
8
He's a ridiculous Catholic
0
0
2
I don't think so. I could be wrong-way too many people watching now.

Roberts won't do it.
0
0
1
I hope she's wrong.
0
0
0