The 14th Amendment is clear. ALL people born in the USA are citizens. If you don't like it, make a new amendment.

If the 2nd Amendment argument is ANY arms should be welcome, does that include bombs, grenades, nukes?

When do public safety issues count?

Unlimited arms are NOT part of the text.

April 12, 2026 - 11:54 UTC

4
0
45
Once Due Process was interpreted as "citizen" instead of "person"(as it is written in the Constitution), the only thing a fascist had to do was dehumanize everyone who disagrees with the fascist.
"Illegal immigrants", "terrorists"...it's all the same to ignorance.
1
0
2
The key phrase here is 'well regulated'. When schoolchildren, spouses, and ordinary folks walking down the street are gunned down on a daily basis, that suggests necessary regulation is lacking. I propose regulation similar to automobiles...required training, competence, registration and insurance.
1
0
1
👍👍👍❤️❤️❤️
0
0
0
But unlimited arms are in fact part of the text. The founders never imagined we would change the constitution so little over this time span, which would allow us to account for new technologies. The 2A is specifically about civilians owning weapons of war.
1
0
1
Plain text reading. The *right* shall not be abridged. Nothing about what kind, how many, etc. The first clause explains the rationale but doesn't specify anything else.

I agree the framers couldn't account for new tech. That's why laws and amendments evolve. That we haven't is what we need to fix.
1
1
0
And BTW…

Exercising his 2nd Amendment right in the most true spirit of the Constitution is exactly what Alex Pretti was doing when he was murdered by his government.
0
0
11