Nothing will be OK until we have a sane person running the world and no good purpose is served pretending otherwise.

April 08, 2026 - 10:22 UTC

74
23
1775
but a lot of people will be making a shit ton of money in the meantime...
0
0
0
What's he going to do to distract us from the Epstein files now then?
0
0
1
Never trust a man who’s idea of a regime change is to remove two layers off an onion and call it a truffle
0
0
11
Or at least a supporting cast who aren’t just massive shithouses.
0
0
0
He has years left so plenty of time for more of his dangerous bulls*t
0
0
1
Trying to find one person to "run the world" is part of the problem
1
0
12
Stop making sense, Brooke. Gah. Now I have to go listen to the Talking Heads. BRB.
0
0
1
No sane person would suggest that one person can, should, or already does run the world.

Why are humans dickheads so often?
0
0
0
He’s not insane. He’s just a wanker.
0
0
0
"The world"?

Therein lies the problem.
0
0
1
Beg your pardon but who is this effing dictator that is supposed to run the world ? With what bloody army ?

180 sovereign countries will politely tell you to sod off.
0
0
1
It feels a long way off at the moment.

Trump, Putin, Netanyahu, Orbán and all the quislings jumping on their corrupt bandwagon for personal gain- they have some mighty momentum in global affairs

The only possible upside is that Europe ups its game for energy, defence and food supply. Together.
0
0
2
Who do you propose?
0
0
0
When will we be grown up enough to eschew 'strong man leadership'? We seem ever more enthralled by populism, revolution and drama. Give me the boring predictable technocrats of dutiful civil service, I'm tired of messianic leadership.
0
1
14
👏👍
0
0
0
Listening to the radio at work and you'd be forgiven for thinking Trump has absolutely nailed this deal with Iran rather than being in a far worse position than when he started. And yesterday they also seemed to think preventing Ye coming to the UK was a bigger story than Trump threatening genocide
0
0
0
Maybe we could aim higher and not have any single leader “running the world”?
0
0
0
Hopefully there will not be any person - sane or otherwise - "running the world"

The idea is itself delusional....
2
0
25
Trump has proven that the USA is an autocracy, and the US military dominates the world.

All hail the Autarch!
1
0
0
I think the post is their application for US citizenship, planning on fitting right in.
0
0
0
"the world" oh Americans...
1
0
13
right?
0
0
1
Are there any truly sane people operating at that level? Anyone who gets close to those levels of power is probably fucking mental.
0
0
4
If Starmer ran the world the global economy would immediately ossify. His red lines would prevent any possibility of progress.
0
0
0
I change it to "... sane people with the planet's best interests at heart running...".
0
0
6
Why do we need one person running the world anyway?

There are BILLIONS of people on this planet.

Barely a handful of rich white men hold us all to ransom and enrich *themselves* beyond measure.

How is this right?
1
0
40
It's not right but that is the reality of certain people who were born rich and powerful but who dont feel "enriched" unless they hold absolute power of everyone..
1
0
0
Pretty sure that today’s result was not quite the same as what AI told him would happen a month ago.
0
0
1
Congress needs to spend the next two weeks wisely, in getting rid of the bastard.
0
0
3
Are you volunteering?
0
0
0
The arrogance in your statement is whats wrong with 🇺🇲. #uspoli
0
0
1
"Running the world"?

yeah, that will totally work fine.

How about this: nothing will be OK until *all* men finally learn to nourish their ego by creating something worthwhile, instead of being little cunts?
0
0
0
I think Putin is pretty sane though. Evil, but not mad mad.
0
0
0
There is a cure for the American disease. This vaccine was first applied on the 14th of July 1789. A booster is now overdue for application.
0
0
1
We - and as many other countries as possible - need to get away from US influence. Whether it is cultural, economical, political, no good comes of associating with them.
0
0
15
Maybe we should stop trying to run the world?
0
0
1
Nothing will be ok until we live in a world where one person doesn't run it
0
0
0
Sane person? In this economy?
0
0
3
Just bumping from one crisis to another, resetting the incident clock and awaiting the next social media rant.
0
0
1
Can we actually trust Americans to not make this mistake again though?
2
0
20
No.
0
0
0
Never. He was the inevitable result, not the cause.
2
0
32
By world I take it you mean America?
0
0
0
Nothing will be ok until we understand that no single person should run the world and that no single country should have this much power.
3
0
108
Especially when representatives of that single country (Vance) go to foreign countries and tell they they aren’t allowed the same sort of union (Europe).
2
0
29
100%. Our majority of voters in US bear the guilt of electing a madman. But NATO allies should never have accepted a "world order" with one hegemon.
1
0
1
“History shows there are only two paths to international stability - hegemony or the balance of power. The latter is preferable.” - Kissinger
0
0
4
I nominate Thanos. Couldn't do a worse job.
0
0
0
Certainly looks and feels like a President with an illness that has a mental element that needs sorting
0
0
7
I think this has demonstrated clearly that the American president really doesn't run the world!!
0
0
1
Mark Carney should be the real Leader of the World.

Integrity & intellect.
1
0
0
I know where you’re coming from, but, wasn’t he a banker?
1
0
0
And/or world leaders calling atrocities and perpetrators out other countries and their leaders for their war crimes.
0
0
0
So Ye is banned from the UK while Charles makes a state visit to Trump. Dissonance anyone?
0
0
0
It is distressing that I agree with you. It is depressing we do not include or even allude to competency, but the current disaster is of such proportions that I’d happily take a dim, dull, incompetent person who is sane.
0
0
0
Nothing more certain than he will find his next target to lash out on.
0
0
0
Is this what passes for liberalism these days
0
0
0
Too much power in the hands of one person is never a good idea, Muad'Dib.

Well formed standards, governance, science and law, diversity, and a state which serves and enables the people is a lot better.

The post-WWII settlement is the last known good save point.
0
0
0
Not one person should run the world, or America it seems 😏
0
0
6
It’s obvious the US will not act to bring an end to this evil madman so what can other world leaders do?

They have to do something before he kills us all.
0
0
1
Running the world???
America...does not. And never has...run the world.

You're not the world Ian. You're not!
0
0
12
Would be great if the muppet who seems to think he should rule the world concentrated on doing what he said and just ran America (probably into the ground).
0
0
0
Bless your heart for thinking the US President, regardless of who that is, will run the world … America has lost its place in the World order and will have to work hard to gain the trust of the rest of the world
0
0
1
Absolutley agreed. You can shove your TACO's you know where - this madman nearly caused WW3 and he has to be stopped.
0
0
0
Or do away with one person ruling the world would be even better
0
0
0
The dubious sanity of ONE man has little to do w what’s being done, & ALLOWED, in Gaza/Lebanon/Syria/Yemen/Sudan/Somalia/Iran/Venezuela/Cuba. Dishonest, greedy, elitist billionaires & western society promoted as ‘civilising’ by their media IS the pretence that’s harming us all.
0
0
1
I'd be available for a small fee
10
1
142
If you're unavailable, Gazza would be a fucking improvement.
1
0
5
Catch-22: If you want to run the world, you are not perfectly sane, and therefore not a suitable person to run the world.
0
0
1
No one person should run the whole world.
0
0
8
we'd give you a big fee
1
0
1
I'd chip in for that!
0
0
0
Have you 'aced' your cognitive tests?
2
0
0
I think the world would be willing to have a whip round!
0
0
0
Yes please.
0
0
2
They can't afford you
3
0
38
Right now, my dog, Big Andy would do a better job, but you're preferable.
2
0
5
The USA does NOT run the world!!

We the UK and the USA need Proportional Representation NOW¡!

Proven the world over to keep extremists out of power....
0
0
5
We also don’t need one person running the world, that’s why we are in this mess to begin with.
0
0
0
Sanity is not enough without integrity and probably lots of other things
0
0
0
Can we have several sane people rather than just one?
0
0
14
"A sane person running the world"? Seriously? There should never be a singular person "running the world".
1
0
2
That’s exactly what I thought.
0
0
2
We need "Empty Vessel", "Journeyman" sycophantic bootlickers like Keir Starmer gone too
0
0
5
What a brilliant deal eh, Trump puts the price of everything up because of an unnecessary illegal war then tries to stop the war but making everything even more expensive by making a deal that allows Iran to take £2m for ever ship that sails past Iran, the guy is a genius.
1
0
8
But remember no one knows more about making deals than Trump 😂
0
0
5
Speaking of deranged fascists running the country into the ground and threatening global destruction, the new series of The Boys is out today...
1
0
3
It is indeed
0
0
0
Why is any one country allowed to dominate the world as you suggest? Time to rethink for sure
1
0
1
Money.

Nuclear weapons.
1
0
2
My coffee is ok this morning
0
0
2
Maybe Trump is right that he could become president of Venezuela?

Starting with immediate effect and he can take Vance with him.

A banana republic is the correct level of responsibility. He can have all the statues of himself he wants and leave the rest of us alone.
1
0
1
What did Venezuelans do to deserve that?
0
0
1
Nobody wants the US running the world.
0
0
9
Corporate capture of the US fronted by the worst possible person.

As a species, we really should do better.
0
0
0
The US PRESIDENT doesn't run the world.
0
0
3
Indeed not. Meanwhile Trump is running out of ever bigger threats
0
0
1
Trump doesn’t run the world. He just fiddles with the easy bits.
0
0
0
I think you mean running America. There are plenty of sane people running Europe and China has been not too shabby during this conflict. We've witnessed the downfall of America. All great civilisations over reach and fail eg Roman empire.
0
0
2