He's going to run as the anti-war candidate in 2028 and the stupidest people you know are all going to pretend to believe it.
20
3
653
The thing about being JD Vance is that your best chance of being the 2028 nominee is that It Happens and you become president. But if you become president, you can't secretly oppose the war anymore; you have to fight it, or lose it.

Won't stop NYT from carrying water for him, but it'll hurt him.
0
0
4
The charisma of a warthog, if it's him against tucker carlson for the republican nomination, it's the shithouse with a mastery of media all day long. Can the republican save their party or their country from that, not optimistic.
0
0
1
He'll lose the primary by double digit margins, and that's assuming that the RNC doesn't pre-emptively bar anyone not-named Trump from running.
0
0
6
Tyler Austin Harper reporting for duty
1
0
41
I think we should send him to war. Not picky about which war.
3
0
42
He's still going to lose in a landslide.
1
0
0
“Not if we have anything to do with it”-Jake Tapper and Dana Bash
0
0
2
and the NYT and the rest of big media will lead the charge
0
0
1
Are you ready for the “Vance the Dove vs Hawkish AOC” headlines?
0
0
6
Anti (((war))))
0
0
10
Again this is a man who NYT's OWN REPORTING said was arguing for a "go big or go home" approach:
0
0
3
Listen I’m not saying *I* buy it but you have to accept that it is only persuasive because AOC voted to fund the Iron Dome that time, it’s reasonable for young men to suspect she’s a warmonger who is thirsting to send troops to the Middle East
1
0
28
When she said "I oppose this illegal, immoral war with Iran" that was her clearly indicating that she would support a DIFFERENT war with Iran, probably one she intends to launch with nuclear weapons and Ukrainian conscripts.
1
0
30
they had him pose for 87 minutes with his finger like that and this was the best shot
0
0
1
The stupidest people I know vote based on vibes and he will never have the vibes they seek
0
0
3
"the stupidest people you know are all going to pretend to believe it"

First and foremost, the NYT
0
0
2
Not letting MAGA have a clean slate for 2028 is the only reason why I want Trump to survive in office until November 5, 2028.

He can live longer if we get a guarantee of prison time for him.
1
0
4
That reason is the flimsiest, weakest reason for him to serve the whole term. But, as you say, it's the *only* reason there is. I think we could manage to overcome the "clean slate" angle given the vast benefits to his term ending early. And MAGA doesn't *want* a clean slate.
0
0
1
Rinse/repeat, MAGA.
0
0
0
“His eyes are so smoky.”
0
0
1
Finally merging the bell end of the horseshoe
0
0
1
I wonder how anti-war he’ll be after Iranian negotiators leave him hanging for a couple of days.
0
0
1
"Did you see he even called Trump *Hitler*? Talk about prescient" and then going on about how Trump was terrible but so are (((Israelis))).

What will Hitler as a US cultural symbol even be in 2035, goddamn
0
0
1