It seems to me that if this is going to be a useful tool, the test will be when a well resourced Claimant brings an arguable-but-weak case against a litigant-in-person.

March 12, 2026 - 18:57 UTC

1
0
1
(I accept the Claimant was a barrister so might normally be considered to have some sort of ability to prosecute his own case effectively but that doesn't seem to be objectively what happened here!)
1
0
0
I agree. It's a very unusual case. The J acknowledged the point about the expected power imbalance being missing and lots (but not all) of the problems being due to a lack of expertise.
0
0
2