well, that's exactly what he says. one interaction vs a lot of interactions. it's a great tool to use as a support in areas you know about, at least in the ones I do (Econ and Maths)

October 17, 2025 - 11:22 UTC

1
1
0
The machine that cannot do 1+1 consistently is not good for maths, and revenue-cost= profit does not mean you work in maths either

It makes sense that an economist would defend chatgpt, you invent even more shit on a regular basis
1
0
1
I have studies in Economics, Maths and Data Science. A lot of the LLMs are very good at Calculus, Statistics and Probability Theory. Maybe you are the one who doesn't know about Maths and think that it's about sums

I'm also a communist so don't reduce Econ to marginalist BS
0
0
0