The children presented an equal protection claim, arguing that EPA is discriminating against them in favor of present consumers.

Held: record does not suggest that EPA's GHG regulations were made with this discriminatory intent.

April 09, 2026 - 18:10 UTC

1
0
7
The Court notes that the children *are* present-day consumers, who equally benefit from EPA's allegedly deficient GHG regulations.
1
0
7
As if kids somehow chose to live in a system that's killing the climate
0
0
0