LoL. Of course the case they cited isn't about this. The case they cited was primarily about whether the person allegedly defamed was a "public official"

April 10, 2026 - 23:21 UTC

1
0
12
I also get a bit of side-eye when the case cite is older. Yes, I know - sometimes you want to cite to the OG - but I like to cite to a current case - because it shows it is still good law.
2
0
2
I cite to older law if it is still good law (not overturned, modified); states the legal point I'm making; and doesn't otherwise harm my client. Newer cases may be better, but there are many older cases that set the standard. For defamation, NY Times v Sullivan is the seminal case for defamation.
0
0
2
Or just cite to NYT v. Sullivan - THE MOST FAMOUS DEFAMATION CASE EVER
0
0
1