The United States for several generations has been practically gleeful in its treatment of civilians as valid military targets and the belief that "killing a child is killing a future enemy", but the moment another government responds by involving the public in its defense efforts it's "coercion"

April 07, 2026 - 22:16 UTC

1
0
4
Yes, we began this "war" with a deliberate strike on a children's school and then double-tapped to kill the rescue workers. Yes, this visible civilian toll is the main reason the U.S. public opposes the war. Yes, the president openly craves more civilian death. But how DARE you strategize around it
1
0
4
Or, to put it another way: If an invading force with all the world's weapons openly declares intent to destroy your civilization and slaughter your people, and the visibility of that violence is actively shredding their morale and troop count, is it smarter to hide or to force the world to watch?
0
0
4