why was it bad when trump tried to deny the history of the US with his project 1776 nonsense but okay when liberals do it?

February 10, 2026 - 13:26 UTC

2
0
112
Well one is the sitting president. The defacto most powerful person in the world who is actively removing information at national parks on these very things and banning the use of words at the federal level.

The other is a guy on bluesky who is not doing that. Hope that clears some things up!
1
0
32
but he agrees with the first guy, that seems like a problem
1
0
23
The far left uses the rhetorical tricks of children, but thinks they are clever and righteous, instead of actually courageously wrestling with the fact that nobody is perfect, and you have to do the best you can IF you care more about helping people than being more pure than your lefty friends.
21
3
51
Genocide apologist
0
0
1
just say "social justice warrior" like the conservatives used to, it's a stupid petty mouthfull but it's still shorter than what you just said.
0
0
6
>the rhetorical tactics of children?

To ask people to not use slurs about Native Americans? You definitely are more conservative than me, bucko. Probably more conservative than some members of the GOP if that's your idea of taking it "too far"
0
0
17
nobody is perfect. but you fucking pieces of shit use that to justify genocide. So go fuck yourself
0
0
8
*world longest jack off motion*
0
0
5
"nobody's perfect so you should just accept racism and shut up around your social betters"
-shitlibs
1
0
34
They told him he was being racist and he melted down and doubled down on the racism.
0
0
22
Why are you defending racists?
1
0
6
Standing up against revisionist genocidal history narratives is helping people. You cannot confront and address racism if you’re unwilling to acknowledge actual history. You have no interest in actually helping people you only care about preserving White egotism.
0
0
3
Your factional leadership has for years made decisions on their imaginary friends input and you brain dead imbeciles still try to pathologize people asking you to acknowledge reality as children?
0
0
2
"POBODY'S NERFECT" a reasonable centrist
1
0
12
i don’t think being a child rapist slave owner is a matter of purity of thought. i simply would not base my country on the ideals of such a man, but ofc libs loves doing necrophilia on george washington and thomas jefferson soooo
0
0
8
And Centrists continue to attack Leftists instead of focusing their ire against the literal Fascists.
1
0
23
smooth brain in full effect
0
0
2
What about the libs that go to bat to defend their shitlib friends who deny genocides?

I'd rather litigate the truth than glaze the dick of some privileged know nothing being a fucking asshole and defend his demonstrably stupid takes.
3
0
69
No where here is any side helping anyone this is just a rhetorical argument. Also very ironic to say unlike you lefties I am clever and righteous because I care about helping people so much.
0
0
5
Ah purity. Heads up. The left doesn't believe in the concept or idea of purity. Purity is famously an idea used by Nazis and the far right in their ambition to create a white only state. When we see that term used to attack the left, we know the person using it is a fascist.
1
0
0
“The rhetorical tricks of children” you mean like saying “well, technically, the word ‘slavery’ isn’t even in the Constitution, so the founders were secretly against slavery.”
0
0
33
oh look it's another centrist punching left, how novel
1
0
29
just don't call racial minorities slurs. it's not difficult
0
0
0