'AM I BAD?' is a grand and cosmic question that is well beyond our scope. fine. here on the ground, the DAY TO DAY effects are that your actions contribute to hurt and suffering in small or large ways, and those who hurt and suffer because of you are allowed to not like you because of it. SORRY BUD.

March 25, 2026 - 16:57 UTC

3
5
1540
what is alternative? forcing folks to enjoy the art of those who hurt them? THEY DONT LIKE IT. someone saying 'your choices harm me so i dont like your creations and i dont like you' is not offensive, it is the most basic use of human autonomy and it is SO bizarre when folks argue otherwise
3
3
1501
This argument precludes those injured by the property being FORCED to consume it. Which they arent. No one is forcing Trans individuals to watch or read HP or anything else J.K. is involved with. 🤔

This is like straights complaining about gay marriage. If you arent gay, dont get one and f off.
7
0
1
"I don't like this and here's why" is the most unimpeachable position a person can hold.

You can't argue someone into finding something beautiful or safe or worth their time.
0
0
19
if you are a bigot or support bigotry or act in a movie built on the profits of hate, people are allowed to not like you 1. because bigotry is bad and 2. because people generally DONT LIKE THINGS THAT HURT THEM. like this is so obvious. it is not 'canceling' it is an exercise in basic human autonomy
9
5
1800
I disagree
0
0
0
This is a question Rowling's fans are completely unequipped to answer accurately because for her Goodness and Badness are teams you can just join, and whatever follows is in service of the team, regardless of the harm.
1
0
16