It's the same error that people make when they assume that because an LLM succeeds at a task humans need to use their full mental powers to perform well at, that means the LLM matches or exceeds those human mental powers, just in the other direction.
1
0
6
It also devalues human intelligence IMO. Like, the long division algorithm is a very simple thing computationally. There is nothing hard or impressive about a computer doing it. A human child, using a brain THAT NEVER EVOLVED FOR THIS, learning to execute and utilize that algorithm is a marvel.
0
0
6