idk how I'm supposed to not think everyone being dazzled by this shit is a dumbass

April 02, 2026 - 21:03 UTC

7
3
121
The idiocy of "export const CYBER_RISK_INSTRUCTION" will live in my brain forever, unfortunately.
0
0
0
If magical thinking was a type of code 😂
0
0
0
I've kinda had a theory that a lot of the people working on LLMs don't really understand how they work, given how often they're just given instructions to follow in plain English as if they're a person, instead of a program that spouts language.
0
0
9
I really feel like I'm going crazy. Its so obvious. It always has been. How are adult professionals not able to see this from a mile away? And then it just ends up its even worse than we thought.

People just let money do the thinking for them I guess.
2
0
13
I'm a pentester. Trust me, bro.
0
0
1
This article was an informative read, essentially making the (supported) claim that if you can reconfigure YOURSELF to its idiosyncrasies, at least some of the claims about its coding capabilities are "true enough".

(And also that it was an unpleasant and self-destructive experience.)
1
0
3
absolutely wild, my profession is so fucking cooked lmao
0
0
1
“Make sure that the EVIL BIT is set to FALSE”

(later, realizing the flaw in this plan)

Oh no, I forgot to write “Important:”
0
0
9
like. c'mon dude. I'm dying here. you wrote a regex to detect negative sentiment in you LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL APPLICATION
3
0
63
how much of the perceived improvements in newer versions of this tool is just their engineers frantically adding more and more lines of text to system prompts pleading desperately with their stupid machine to fuck their wife more quietly
2
1
46
so wait, it wouldn't catch "Piece of fucking junk"?
It's been a while since I worked with regular expressions and state machines...
0
0
0
And omitted “klanker”?!
0
0
0