I will note that Trump, SecDef, SouthCom, etc have been posted snuff films for many months now.

Killing for content is a feature of this administration's use of force.

April 10, 2026 - 03:33 UTC

15
5
929
Absolutely!

As long as it's a clear "Us vs. Them" construction, some people will go for it. A lot of some people, in fact.
0
0
2
As someone who actively avoids snuff clips, I'm confused on this one. Is it categorically worse than distributing the Pretti or Good or Floyd killings? Have the angry folks avoided them till now? Absent details I don't wanna delve into, it's not clear what distinguishes this from related incidents.
1
0
2
Seeing the actual victim during the violence.
0
0
2
Like the war porn newsreel in 1984.
0
0
3
many months ago…
bsky.app/profile/emmagoldman.bsky.social/post/3m7d7pnfjcc2f
0
0
2
0
0
0
Art of the Deal says projecting a certain perception can force reality by using that perception as leverage.
2
0
4
“Killing for content” - chilling.
0
0
6
Good point.
0
0
0
Taking notes.
0
0
1
"have been posted" or "have been posting"? not english native here, and I see a huge semantic difference between the two.
1
0
0
“Have been posting” is correct.
1
0
1
Spectacle as propaganda.
0
0
0
There is a very steady degradation of the whole idea of what it means to be a Republican going on right before our eyes.

The Republican Party platform can now be accurately described as: self-absorbed, self-serving, and to hell with everybody else. Worship those who do it best.
0
0
2
I've only seen a few examples, but yes. I'd bet someone has posted images from 300, too, but oddly they'd be much more enamored of a giant glistening Xerxes and his Persians.
0
0
3
They are sick sadistic a holes with murderous impulses….and their positions allow them to act on those impulses with zero accountability.
0
0
0
It's immoral. It's disgusting. And it must end.
0
0
1