No. the Earth set photo is cropped and rotated to be similar to the Apollo photo. The entire moon disk was visible since they were 4000 miles away. Cool pic anyway
Is it really βsettingβ if itβs only the observer (spacecraft) moving, while the same face of the Moon is always facing Earth? From a fixed position on the Moon, the Earth doesnβt rise or set.
(Similar issues with the famous βEarthriseβ photo taken by Apollo 8 in 1968.)
Do you know whether we will eventually be getting video-imagery from this mission? I ask as one who still recalls watching the 1969 moon landing in moving images.
This one is absolutely amazing. Is it what an uninhabited, rocky stretch of Earth would look like if we could take a photo that discounted the atmosphere? It looks sooo close, like a giant hand could simply rest on it...
It is very difficult to reconcile that this nation is venturing around the Moon and inspiring humanity at the very same moment that our President is threatening to end a civilization on the Earth.
I'm curious, why does Earth look so big here, isn't it smaller in other Earthrise pictures? Is it a depth of field thing because Artemis isn't on the Moon per se but pretty far beyond it (as evidenced by the serious curvature on the Moon that you obviously don't see when on it)?