people split hairs about the genocide classification all the time, but Trump unambiguously wrote down his intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national group, and then he broadcast it out

April 07, 2026 - 12:43 UTC

8
3
1135
bsky.app/profile/did:plc:batsov5c6h6e54mpj6wrqzt4/post/3mivwyr7rx22s

How far can you extend- it is time to stop people like this for ever!
0
0
0
don't even need the in part, he went out and said in whole
0
0
0
There have always been differing views on the concept (see below on its origin and competing ideas), but if this threat isn't beyond the pale, then the idea is pointless.

www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/227917/east-west-street-by-philippe-sands/
0
0
0
0
0
0
I see a post saying he or his team specifically intended his post to meet the genocide standard—I don't know if that's so because he's constantly threatening to commit war crimes & crimes against humanity, & he's committed a lot of them. People should have taken each threat & commission seriously.
0
0
45
It was the US who was the imminent threat to global peace all along. Planning genocide now. US is the new Nazi Germany. Trump is maniac with the largest nuclear arsenal in the world.
0
0
1
Never mind that his only partner in this lose/lose/lose/lose/lose/lose scenario is an indicted Genocideaire. The Mad Pedo King needs to be removed, Netanyahu needs The Hague.
0
0
0
It's likely he has a legal opinion from somewhere in the administration that anything he's threatening is justified.
0
0
1