Ways to get there:

- 25A (by far hardest, useless)
- Straight impeachment (H. majority + 2/3 S.)
- Fund nothing until he's gone (fewest votes needed, just a willing majority in either house, but takes the longest)
- Congress declares him 14AS3 disqualified (simple majorities)
- uhh... [redacted]

April 07, 2026 - 18:10 UTC

68
23
1765
14A would be lit
0
0
0
14AS3 disqualification would create the most "interesting" outcomes of all these.
3
1
117
Unless whatever political shift that would enable any of these happens *very* quickly (such that it takes him by surprise), I think 14AS3 is going to be the most practical to get around the...sweeping...pardons that I'm expecting
0
0
8
Nothing changes without Congress getting more "interesting."
0
1
0
The cool thing is it would also free up two SCOTUS seats and a lot of places in the legislature, in addition to retroactively pocket vetoing a lot of appropriations bills
1
0
66
Everyday is a "it might happen today" day tbh
0
0
0
Those last two
0
0
0
my vote is for redaction
0
0
0
@markwarner.bsky.social @kaine.senate.gov
0
0
1
Redacted 👀
1
0
4
Initiate operation valkyrie.
0
0
3
No congressional majorly needed for [redacted], just saying
0
0
7
I got into a long argument about article 5. Which is a ridiculous idea.
0
0
0
I like redacted. Can we do redacted?
0
0
0
"Congress declares him 14AS3 disqualified (simple majorities)" - should be done, but would also take long because it's a novel approach, would be contested, doesn't yet have public buy-in as a way to remove a sitting president...
2
0
13
This one is… kind of untimely though, since they already certified him, without even a proper challenge in Congress, despite some state courts and officials declaring the obvious.
2
0
11
Nothing in the federal government can constitutionally withstand a sufficiently motivated Congress.
0
0
0
Maybe mine is a trash take but what do you think about whether 25a could potentially be more viable in light of political considerations despite the more difficult standard?

bsky.app/profile/patdeklotz.bsky.social/post/
0
0
6
Why are Dems posting online without live-streaming their FaceTimes, phone calls, and in person meetings where they are pressuring the JUST A HANDFUL of Republicans they need? Are we to believe NONE of them can be persuaded to turn on a raping pedophile who wants to start nuclear war?!
0
0
1
If people are going to put [redacted] on the table, they should have to explain why they personally haven't done anything.
0
0
4
This rat bastard is to thank for this!! @scotusblog.com
0
0
0
Don't see any constitutional path to the disqualification option. That's just not possible.
0
0
0
[Redacted]
0
0
0
I'm afraid I've broken your [redacted] button by pressing on't feverishly.
0
0
0
A big ol' shot of morphine in his ass
0
0
0
Never in my life did I think I would be begging and pleading (internally) for [redacted], but here we are.
0
0
1
Pretty sure the Pentagon firings are, at least in part, an attempt by the regime to head off any possibility of [redacted].
0
0
1
Can a custodian leave a strategic mop puddle (by accident!) by some stairs or something?
0
0
9
March on Washington and fill the streets, shut the whole city down until he resigns*

*This is a bad idea but exists as an option
1
0
2
He will just open fire. Kent State but more lost.
1
0
0
- extradite Trump & Hegseth to the Internetional Criminal Court at the Hague for war crimes / public incitement to commit genocide would be great too...
0
0
1
Is there no limited window for 14a? Didn't "we" all decide it didn't count?
0
0
0
I am calling on everyone to do their duty and not drive their crazy ass MAGA parents/grandparents to the polls on Election Day. They’ve made a big enough mess, keep them home on Election Day.
1
0
31
"Everyone eats free at Cracker Barrel November 3rd!"
1
0
13
Cutting funding won’t work, he’s already usurped that power
0
0
1
I like “Uhhhh”
0
0
1
I vote “uhhhh…”
0
0
0
Massie for speaker
Impeach Vance
Impeach Trump
1
0
0
Impeaching the President for bribery (successfully) removes everyone else. One fell swoop, as it were

I say bribery because it's the easiest to prove
1
0
4
Is there not a way for 25A to create space and room for impeachment?
0
0
0
There's also the additional aspect that legitimately undertaking any of these steps might make him stroke out.
0
0
1
At a very practical level what would happen after a declaration by Congress that 14AS3 applied? What would enforcement look like? I don't know law well, but it's hard for me to see the concrete steps of how you get from that declaration by Congress to someone else (presumably Vance?) being president
2
0
2
Well, what if they found out Trump was only 30 years old--the exact procedure might be tbd, but just because the procedure hadn't been formalized wouldn't give him a free pass to continue being president.
1
0
2
As with anything else, it's a matter of holding out on "we're the one and only Congress of the United States, the constitutionally legitimate elected representatives of the sovereign people, and we say so."
1
0
6
At least with the 25th, the GOP people needed stand to personally gain power whereas no Congressional GOP stands to personally benefit from voting for impeachment.
0
0
0
Fund nothing until November and then take it from there. Maybe we can still vote our way out.
0
0
0
I think, if we are being honest, the best option is the "uhh." Right?
0
0
0
Could we 5150 the guy?
4
0
4
He's a harm to others so.... if he wasn't POTUS then probably. Ugghhhh
0
0
0
It's called the 6505+ nowadays.
0
0
0
In Florida, would this be just one doctor’s signature, with time extensions until a conservatorship can
be obtained? Might require Secret Service cooperation — or maybe they could arrange their own coup with this as a side effect.
0
0
1
Baker Act. He’s a Florida resident
0
0
0
The failure of US institutions up to this point means it is the most assured bet going forward.
0
0
0
Still rooting for MI
0
0
0
Quickest is to use his own tactics against him. Bluff, say you have enough votes in the Senate to impeach him and his best option is to resign.
0
1
0
There is 0% chance anything other than the last one happens
0
0
0
Redact him straight to redacted no state redacted

And seize all his families assets
0
0
6
my opinion about the word "nullification"? the jury is no longer out.
0
0
1
which of those five has the best historic track record, I am asking as a purely academic exercise
0
0
3
One large "redacted" combo platter, please
0
0
16
25A is fastest, but is also only temporary, & has the highest bar for permanency. Its primary advantage is it immediately strips away his power at the start of the process, rather than at the end.

1 & 2, done in conjunction, seem, to me, to be the fastest, safest, easiest, best, way to get there.
0
0
0
Been dreaming of [redacted] for a long while now
1
0
13
Given how many members of Congress betray us on the regular, I'm surprised that [redacted] hasn't been happening periodically for decades.
0
0
6
- “Saturday Night Massacre” inside the Pentagon. 100’s of top military staff say enough is enough, he needs to go, or we will go.

- His billionaire donors turn on him and tell him the money will stop if he continues.

- people hit the streets, shut down the economy completely.
0
1
4
et tu (redacted)
1
0
3
Let’s be honest the only option here is the redacted one. Dems are fucking useless cowards and hes being supported by other brain washed idiots that blow his ego every night.
0
0
5
When did the multipronged 2020 "steal the election" insurrection begin and when did it end?

One of the reasons Congress hasn't removed Trump's insurrectionist disability is because Johnson is an insurrectionist that continues providing aid and comfort.
0
0
12
A few GOP members could also switch caucases and end Johnson's enabling.
0
0
0
Gee, I wonder which of these is the fastest and most reliable
2
0
57
[redacted]?
0
0
0
0
0
1
I prefer [redacted].
0
0
5
ALL should be pursued simultaneously! This should have happened with Venezuela war crimes!
0
0
3
I would point that that states tried to keep him off their ballots by the application of the 14th amendment. SCOTUS struck this down hence the election was a sham!
0
0
6
Hoping for multiple lighting strikes in a row. Chances are low but not 0
0
0
0
wouldn't 14th Amendment disqualification require an Act of Congress that can be vetoed?
1
0
1
Why would the president need to sign it? They’re not passing a law. There’s nothing anywhere saying it would need to be signed or could be vetoed. Even if it could be vetoed, who would veto it, since there would be no legal president?
1
0
1
If [redacted] is the only way to avoid Armageddon, I’m in.
3
0
22
Are we voting? I vote [redacted] and am ready to lend post-redacted support for legal funds, inspirational t-shirts, etc.
0
0
3
This is known as harm reduction.
And the ratio would be very clear.
0
0
21
Now we just need to find the shrink ray. I left it here somewhere.
0
0
1
🤐 bsky.app/profile/kristinekenyon.bsky.social/post/3ljv32feqd22j
0
0
7
I'm going with "redacted"
0
0
9
Andy thanks for that dark bit of humor you put in there.
0
0
0
I'm not sure I agree 25A is the hardest or useless. There's cover in it for crossover. "It's not that we think he's bad, it's that we think he's too sick now. It's shame, but it happens."

Will it be seen that way? Probably not.
0
0
0
We need to think creatively because Congress has failed. My favorite: Trump still has pending sentencing for the Stormy Daniels trial. Use that to lock him up. Can a state jail a sitting president? Well I’d consider that more of a norm than the law, and we’re breaking norms left and right.
1
0
10
Even if they can that doesn’t make him not be President and does not deprive him of his power to give orders to the military and the exec branch.
0
0
1
25th is, at best, "We need him out of power for the several hours it will take to assemble a quorum of Senators and Representatives in the Capitol to do the actual things."
0
0
0
Sofa king we Todd ed
0
0
0
uhh... [redacted] unfortunately results in Vance taking power, who is unquestionably as dangerous.
0
0
0
Point of Order: would the President be able to veto a congressional declaration the he is ineligible under the 14As3?
1
0
2
No, you can do it by joint resolution
1
0
15