In principle, endorsing this should merit not just removal from the speakership but expulsion from the House.

March 27, 2026 - 19:45 UTC

14
6
556
we are going to have to have slush fund remediations for decades
1
0
6
tired: superfund remediation
wired: slush fund remediation
0
0
3
it should lead to a trial of violating constitutional oaths
0
0
4
Dump Johnson as Speaker of the House; he is an incompetent boob!!!
0
0
1
What a craven quisling Mike Johnson is!
0
0
3
Can you explain like I’m 5?
1
0
2
The principle that public money can only be spent if appropriated by the legislature is an absolute black-letter constitutional mandate, no exceptions, and more generally the bedrock centuries-old foundation of the entire Anglo-American constitutional tradition. He's endorsing Trump violating that.
4
0
28
Yes but that would require an actual fight by democrats, who prefer strongly-worded letters.
0
0
3
" 'Principle...'? Now that’s a word I've not heard in a long time...a long time..."
0
0
1
Ghosts of the founders should simply apparate out of the rotunda walls and start choking you
3
0
33
Ghost of Thaddeus Stevens, who understood what his job in the House was.
0
0
10
I love that word apparate 😆
0
0
1
Hey, Mike? Read your Constitution? As in "ever"?
0
0
4
I wonder if anything happened with Trump’s memo. It was worded as to basically say “If there is a Santa Claus, ask for a present.”
0
0
0
Crazy to do a press conference where you go: “there is nothing to be concerned about, the president has done crimes and will continue to do crimes”
0
0
20
Give me a break!
0
0
0
My "Mike Johnson is a Cavalier" Take continues to age well
2
0
24
0
0
0
Also in the lapdog sense.
1
0
28
Depatriation.
0
0
2