What people like @gavinnewsom.bsky.social fail to understand is that he’s passively accepting their fascist framing.

Those accusing Dems of “identity politics” are the ones implicitly saying that ALL identities save White Christian Nationalism are invalid. 1/
2
1
31
It was the far Christian right who brought trans people into the conversation - as a deliberate lure to see if Dems would be willing to jettison in ANY form the human rights of any group.

They specifically started small: “mutilating kids” (doesn’t happen.) 2/

Gay marriage was too ubiquitous
1
0
19
oh he understands it just fine, it's deliberate and calculated
0
0
1
Who is he criticizing? Kamala Harris? Abigail Spanberger? Chuck Schumer? And how often is too often when talking about pronouns? Harris seems to have only done so once. He seems to be arguing against some Fox News caricature that might describe Dem voters but has little to do with any candidate.
1
0
0
This is what happens when Democrats let the other side's talking points determine what they say. They end up trying to prove they're not some straw version of themselves (that wouldn't even be wrong) rather than actually charting a path for the future with new ideas.
0
0
0
The Nazis called it “socially normal” and anyone who didn’t fit it was “Asozial”
0
0
3